By admin | November 22, 2010

If you’re anything like me, you’ve found it difficult to watch the recent interviews of George W. Bush, who’s been making the rounds to promote his memoir, without throwing something at the TV. He’s tanned, relaxed and self-satisfied. Judging by the treatment he’s received by the mainstream media, all apparently is forgiven. Gore Vidal was right: This is The United States of Amnesia.

The release of Doug (The Bourne Identity) Liman’s lacerating new political drama therefore couldn’t have been more fortuitously timed. Anyone who’s somehow managed to forget that nitwits and scumbags ruled this country for eight long years and ran it into the ground have only to buy a ticket to Fair Game to have their memories refreshed.

This, of course, is the story of Valerie Plame and Joseph Wilson. Naomi Watts plays the former covert officer in the CIA’s counter-proliferation department. As the movie opens, she’s carrying out orders to investigate Saddam Hussein’s nuclear weapons program and has run up against a problem: He doesn’t appear to have one. This contradicts White House claims. Dick Cheney in particular is insistent that Iraq purchased enriched uranium from Niger. Realizing that the administration has already decided to go to war and is scrambling for justification after the fact, Plame and her superiors have zero interest in being used as patsies.

For that reason the agent’s bosses ask her to see whether her husband, the former ambassador to Niger, would be willing to jump on a plane and use his connections to find out what in fact did or didn’t happen. Oh, and do so for free. Sean Penn is note perfect in the role of the dapper one time diplomat who, as we all know, found that nothing at all had happened. So one can understand his consternation upon tuning into the State of the Union address and hearing the President cite Iraq’s purchasing of uranium from Niger as one of the reasons the U.S. went to war.

His reaction is to set the record straight in a New York Times Op-Ed piece. Plame’s reaction is to soldier on in silence. The White House’s reaction is to smear Wilson and out his wife, the latter being a violation of federal law. But, hey, when you’re comfortable attacking a sovereign nation under false pretenses, blowing an operative’s cover is probably not about to lose you a whole lot of sleep. Even when it results in the murder of dozens of her informants across the Middle East-as many as 70 according to some reports. Scooter Libby took the fall but you just know his boss, Cheney, was behind it all.

It looks for much of the movie as though the couple’s marriage will prove a casualty of the crime as well. The script by brothers Jez and John-Henry Butterworth-based on memoirs by Plame and Wilson-is astute in noting the sorts of fissures and fault lines which begin to threaten stability when a relationship is systematically subjected to the level of nonstop stress this one was.

Watts does wonderfully subtle, complex work here and Penn was born for his role. They’re terrifically convincing as imperfect people struggling to find the right path out of an impossible situation. Liman returns to form in the wake of the embarrassment that was Jumper, giving the picture a riveting docudrama feel by casting actors for certain key parts (Libby and Karl Rove, for example) but incorporating archival footage of the President and Vice President-in effect compelling them to play themselves. It’s a ballsy experiment that pays off in a big way.

A piece of advice: Bring your blood pressure pills if you already use them and get a prescription prior to seeing this if you don’t. As with Charles Ferguson’s equally incendiary Inside Job, many evildoers are exposed but not a single one pays a price. While he ought to be on trial for war crimes, George W. Bush is on a book tour instead.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Jan Santos says:

    Anyone who’s somehow managed to forget that nitwits and scumbags ruled this country for eight long years and ran it into the ground have only to buy a ticket to “Fair Game” to have their memories refreshed…Read More at FilmThreat.com

  2. Mark Bell says:

    I think discussing politics in relation to a film that explores said politics is fine. I also think that you can’t expect someone writing about the film to put aside their own political thoughts anymore than you can ask the person reading the review, seeing the movie, or responding via comments to put aside theirs. It’s part of the topic of the film, and human across the board. Could the reviewer temper their opinion more? Possibly, but why should they have to when no one else seems capable of it?

  3. ron says:

    Rick Kisonak, you’re an idiot.

    Today was the first and last time I will visit this “movie” site.

  4. Wow, so if you don’t agree with the reviewer, he is a “fanatic”? I thought it was a pretty measured assessment of how a lot of people feel that sets the tone for a review. I’m sick of this politics as sports team s**t.

  5. Film Reviewer says:

    Loukas that is the dumbest thing I have heard all night. It is a docu-drama political film based on the very recent socio-political tragedies that have effected America, the middle-east, and a s**t load more of the world.

    If you don’t like criticism with an opinion than go read something else. Bang. Simple.

  6. Loukas Skipitaris says:

    If film reviewers express their own political affiliations and fanaticism in favor or against governmental actions, they cease being film reviewers and become instead opinionated buffoons. We have plenty of those on TV and newspapers. Mr. Kisonak does a disservice to the film industry by remaining a “film reviewer.”

  7. Ronnie says:

    Nitwits and scumbags still rule this country. . .

Join our Film Threat Newsletter

Newsletter Icon