BIRDMAN OR (THE UNEXPECTED VIRTUE OF IGNORANCE) Image

The meta element in Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu’s latest is perhaps its most provocative. It’s impossible, for example, to watch this film, about a 60-something movie star who made his fortune playing a superhero named Birdman a quarter century earlier, when that movie star is played by Michael Keaton-who’s 63 and made his fortune playing Batman a quarter century earlier and not assume the role was written for him.

If any other human being played the role, after all, this wouldn’t be the same film. Birdman is Batman. Riggan Thomson is Michael Keaton repurposed for Inarritu’s trippy showbiz satire. So it had to have been written for him, right?

Wrong. Birdman is one of the most accidental masterworks in movie history. Here’s the scoop: Few critics will come right out and say so but the Mexican-born director’s been responsible for some of the most pretentious, intellectually fallow cinema of our time. Keep a straight face and tell me you yearn to sit through 21 Grams, Babel or Biutiful again as long as you live.

In the midst of a confessed mid-life crisis, Inarritu wrote a screenplay about a film artist coming to grips with his legacy and resolving to cut the crap and take a self-redeeming stab at art. The thing is, its main character was a washed up director-not an actor. If not for an “aha!” moment, some serious rewriting and a dinner with Keaton, Birdman wouldn’t be among the hottest topics in this year’s Oscar conversation. Now you know. Doesn’t that feel better?

And its place in the conversation is well deserved. I can’t think of a movie with as much to say about the warped symbiosis between show business and society-The King of Comedy included. Keaton is all frazzled nerves and bruised ego as Thomson, a has-been gambling his fortune and future on an unlikely comeback. In a last ditch legitimacy grab, he’s mounted a Broadway adaptation of the Raymond Carver story What We Talk About When We Talk About Love. He’s writer, director and star.

The movie chronicles the chaos leading up to opening night. To heighten the tension of its approach, the picture was filmed using a technique creating the illusion of one continuous two hour shot, a miracle of choreography by Gravity cinematographer Emmanuel Lubezki. It’s set against a propulsive jazz drum soundtrack that suggests the racing hearts of the production’s increasingly frantic players (Edward Norton, Naomi Watts and Emma Stone among them and all tip top).

Thomson’s haunted throughout by self doubt, parental regret and, most significantly, by the specter of Birdman himself. The character shadows him on the street mocking Thomson’s need to prove himself an artist and tempting him with the easy millions to be made by simply saying yes to Birdman 4.

The picture is a stylistically fearless rush; surreal one moment, satirical the next but never for a second dull, showy or overreaching. I haven’t seen a film this year with half as much to say about what it means to be an artist, much less the nerve to ask whether art even matters any more in a world where comic book movies and movies about giant toys can generate more money than entire national economies.

Then there’s the profound poignancy of Keaton’s performance. His, after all, was the cowled face that launched a thousand superhero franchises and changed the world of entertainment, a world which largely passed him by since he passed on Batman #3. Riggan Thomson is literally the role of a lifetime. Keaton’s lifetime. Who understands better what happens when you don’t say yes to Batman Forever?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join our Film Threat Newsletter

Newsletter Icon