Film Threat archive logo

JELLYFISH

By Phil Hall | April 4, 2008

Israeli filmmakers Etgar Keret and Shira Geffen are responsible for the inert drama “Jellyfish,” which tries and fails to establish an Altmanesque tapestry of interconnected stories involving three very different women in Tel Aviv. One story focuses on an emotionally withdrawn waitress whose life is turned upside down when she discovers a mute little girl who seems to have been abandoned on a beach. Another story involves a fickle bride whose wedded bliss is disrupted when she breaks her leg during the wedding reception – her Caribbean honeymoon is jettisoned and she winds up in a crummy downtown Tel Aviv hotel. The third tale follows a Philippine caregiver who is hired to assist with an elderly Alzheimers patient.

The theme of broken-down interpersonal communications permeates each story: self-imposed isolation with the waitress, self-indulgence carelessness in the second, and the inability to speak the local language in the third. It’s a fine idea, but Keret and Geffen fumble their opportunity by stuffing the film with obnoxious characters, tin-eared dialogue and more than a little predictability in where the stories are going to lead. Although it runs 78 minutes, it feels like 78 hours.

On top of that, factor in dreary cinematography, clumsy editing, and the misuse of “La Vie en Rose” as a theme song (sung ineptly by Israeli pop star Corinne Allal). The result is a “Jellyfish” with no sting.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Werone says:

    It’s not pure entertainment like Transformers or Ironman. The review seems to have expected transformers part four or five. The film actually says something about interpersonal relationships, how people often misunderstand each other. I like the story and the symbolism. It has deep thought out scenes, with each character being incredibly insightful, likeable and flawed. It is refreshingly good cinema for people who like to think, and have the emotional intelligence to understand it.

  2. Lanay says:

    I would just like to bring to your attention that this overview of the movie is very negative, and based off the opinion of what a film “should” be like.
    This film is special and unique and different; that doesnt mean inadequate or subordinate. To me, the (((art))) lies in the lack of sting, the dead sort of feel. the slowness of it all.

Join our Film Threat Newsletter

Newsletter Icon