PDA

View Full Version : Last Samurai, The


ZombyHero
01-07-2004, 06:01 PM
I really wanted to like this movie. I like Japanese history a lot, and the Meiji period was a very important time of social change for the island country. So I very much wanted to enjoy this film.

But it wasn't to be. There's very little history in the Last Samurai, the audience of given only a small sliver of background information regarding Japan, and the conflict surrounding its Westernization. The film tries very hard to impart the wisdom of the Samurai and its traditions, but in reality, it only tells us that Japanese culture is beyond our understanding (the images of Buddha, for example, are used only to mystify the viewer, instead of trying to reach an understanding of spirituality). The scope of Japanese culture is also very limited, focusing only on warrior lifestyle.

The movie also remains rather ethnocentrist. Rather than attacking the Western ideologies that were in reality so harmful to country, the "bad guys" of the film remain either encapsulated in the "ain't they cold-hearted bastards" military stereotype or are Japanese characters entrenched in Western ideals. Never are the real causes of the country's distress discussed.

Moving past the history and onto the production itself, the film suffers most from a major identity crisis. Yea, multiple genre facets might make some films interesting, but The Last Samurai can't tell if its a historical piece, an action piece, a war movie, or Dances With Wolves (case in point: the "journal entry" voice overs). We're treated to large scale battles with cannons and generals as well as action-hero Tom Cruise kicking the ass of dumb-as-shit soilders while wielding two katanas. But none of it is actually exciting, because the direction during action sequences is too chaotic and confusing to follow well. There's no good flow to them, and it seems like it just cuts back and forth to shots of people getting stabbed. The director also plays with little editing tricks that play with time and perception, but none of it is particularly impactful or meaningful (like the scene where we get treated to a replay of a battle in slow-motion flashback, moments after it concludes in real-time....huh?).

My final gripe, aside from Tom's Cruise's non-existant acting ability is the whole look of the film. Its too dark. Japan is a beautiful, gorgeous country, so why are many scenes shot indoors with rediculously low key lighting? It made me sleepy. Actually, the whole film made me sleepy. So do yourself a favor and take a nap instead instead of paying money to see The Last Samurai.

filmgurl
01-08-2004, 01:20 AM
i was starting to thing i was going crazy, what with the oscar buzz(!?). i truly honestly want to believe that tom cruise can act, but this was not the movie for it. the whole thing just came off like one long cheap rice-king wet dream. and what was with the bad cg encampment shots? seriously, they looked like screenshots from "civilizations" or something.

it's good to know i wasn't the only one "underwhelmed" by this movie.

groudon
01-08-2004, 06:19 PM
He presents the same charactor with the same gesticulations and lame pauses between lines in every one of his movies. He doesn't act, he only attempts to act; he's merely presenting himself, which is still bankable, but it's not acting. Like Nicole Kidman, he's the same charactor in every movie. The scripts are different, the scenery is different, the acting outcome is the same. These are not actors; they are behavioral units stuck in REPLAY mode. Compare Tom Cruise with Phillip Seymore Hoffman, or whatever his name is. Hoffman is one scarey fucker when you see him completely different in personality and behavior from one movie to the next.

morrism
01-08-2004, 07:10 PM
Originally posted by groudon
He presents the same charactor with the same gesticulations and lame pauses between lines in every one of his movies.

Hey, you remember right after he gets captured when he says "WHAT DO YOU WANT FROM ME!!" ??... I had total dejavu when he said that. What other movie is it that he says something like that??

valenabot
01-08-2004, 11:59 PM
morrism:

I'm not sure on that quote, cause I only saw this once but it reminds me of Minority Report.

El Duderino Diablo
01-09-2004, 02:35 AM
Originally posted by filmgurl
the whole thing just came off like one long cheap rice-king wet dream.

Nice. Pretty much what I was thinking the first time I saw the trailer.

filmgurl
01-09-2004, 05:01 PM
i didn't even really want to go, but we got free passes at work since we sponsered the preview (i work for an independent video store in kits) & it was the same night there was a "neon genesis evangelion" marathon going on at my house. i figured it was rice-kings no matter where i went and decided to gamble on the cinematic fight scenes. serves me right. also, having sat through the entire film i can at least way in on the whole offensive piece of crap with impunity.

actually there's a rather funny story about how my boss and i almost ended up seeing "honey" that night by accident, but it's kinda long to post here. not sure which would have been better...

El Duderino Diablo
01-09-2004, 05:25 PM
Videomatica?

filmgurl
01-09-2004, 05:40 PM
uh, yes as a matter of fact. do i know you?

El Duderino Diablo
01-09-2004, 06:56 PM
Doubt it, I haven't rented from there in over a year. Lately I get my video fix from Black Dog which is conveniently closer to me.
It was a guess as there are only two worthy video joints in Kits, Videomatica and Limelight.